- posted by
- 2023-02-07
Coimbatore Railway station to Isha Yoga Center Cab Fare:
Read more| TEN MYTHS ABOUT NUCLEAR WEAPONS 19-Jun-2012. |
COIMBATORE TAXI NEWS 1. Nuclear weapons were needed to defeat Japan in World War II. This is not the opinion of many leading US
military figures in the war. General Dwight Eisenhower, the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe during World
War II and later US president, wrote, “I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of
a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my
belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of ‘face’….”
2. Nuclear weapons prevented a war between the United States and the Soviet Union. There were many deadly
conflicts and “proxy” wars carried out by the superpowers in Asia, Africa and Latin America. The Vietnam War,
which took several million lives, is a prominent example. These wars made the supposed nuclear peace very bloody
and deadly.
3. Nuclear threats have gone away since the end of the Cold War. In the aftermath of the Cold War, a variety of
new nuclear threats have emerged. Among these are the following dangers:
• Increased chances of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists willing to use them;
• Policies of the US government to make nuclear weapons smaller and more usable;
• Use of nuclear weapons by accident, particularly because of decaying Russian infrastructure; and
• Spread of nuclear weapons to other states that may perceive them to be an “equalizer” against a more
powerful state.
4. The United States needs nuclear weapons for its national security. US national security would be far improved
if the US took a leadership role in seeking to eliminate nuclear weapons throughout the world. Nuclear weapons are
the only weapons that could actually destroy the United States, and their continued existence threatens US security.
5. Nuclear weapons make a country safer. By threatening massive retaliation, the argument goes, nuclear weapons
prevent an attacker from starting a war. There are many ways, though, in which deterrence could fail, including
misunderstandings, faulty communications, irrational leaders, miscalculations and accidents.
6. No leader would be crazy enough to actually use nuclear weapons. US leaders, considered by some to be
highly rational, have used nuclear weapons in war, against Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Threats of nuclear attack by
India and Pakistan are an example of nuclear brinksmanship that could turn into a nuclear war. Globally and
historically, leaders have done their best to prove that they would use nuclear weapons.
7. Nuclear weapons are a cost-effective method of national defense. The cost of US nuclear weapons research,
development, testing, deployment and maintenance has exceeded $7.5 trillion.
8. Nuclear weapons are well protected and there is little chance that terrorists could get their hands on one. In
the aftermath of the Cold War, the ability of the Russians to protect their nuclear forces has declined precipitously.
In addition, a coup in a country with nuclear weapons, such as Pakistan, could lead to a government coming to
power that was willing to provide nuclear weapons to terrorists.
9. The United States has worked to fulfill its nuclear disarmament obligations. The United States failed for
nearly four decades to fulfill its obligations under Article VI of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, requiring good
faith negotiations to achieve nuclear disarmament. Ways that President Obama can show leadership for nuclear
disarmament include negotiating a strong replacement for the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty with Russia, pushing
for ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, taking nuclear weapons off of high alert status and adopting a
“No First Use” policy.
10. Nuclear weapons are needed to combat threats from terrorists and “rogue states.” The threat of nuclear
force cannot act as a deterrent against terrorists because they do not have a territory to retaliate against. If the
leaders of a rogue state do not use a rational calculus regarding their losses from retaliation, deterrence can fail
COIMBATORE TAXI NEWS |